Sunday, July 29, 2007

Better Living Through Animal Cruelty

Scientists breed world’s first mentally ill mouse

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2159295.ece

    SCIENTISTS have created the world’s first schizophrenic mice in an attempt to gain a better understanding of the illness.
This reminds me of a joke:
“So, Mr. Mouse, you’re seeking a divorce from your wife, Minnie, because you claim she is insane?”
“I didn’t say she was insane. I said she’s fucking Goofy!”

    It is believed to be the first time an animal has been genetically engineered to have a mental illness.

Apparently, this reporter has never seen the membership rolls of PETA.

    It will allow researchers to study the disease and develop treatments using a limitless supply of laboratory animals.
I love the dig at the activists, here. “A limitless supply.” LOL

    Animal rights campaigners have condemned the research, saying that it is morally repugnant to create an animal doomed to mental suffering.
But you don’t see the activists lining up to volunteer for testing, do you? You could also turn their argument against them, by stating that by blocking the treatment possibilities in the research, the activists will have doomed any future people born with schizophrenia to a lifetime of mental suffering. These are mice, you idiots, bred specifically for research purposes. It’s not like the scientists are kidnapping them off the street, tearing them away from their little mouse families in the dead of night in some Gattaca-inspired frenzy of Gestapo-like tactics.

I like animals, but if I had to put a bullet in my dog to make my family’s life better? Goodbye, Sparky. We’re at the top of the food chain, and it doesn’t matter if you take the religious view (we were given dominion over the animals), or the scientific one (survival of the fittest), animals are not equal to humans.

    Animal Aid, a campaign group, said rodents were not a reliable way of modelling human disease.
How do they know? These are the world’s first schizoid mice, remember? Evidently, the scientists think that there is some use in doing this, and I’m guessing they probably know a little more about it than the activists. If this doesn’t pan out, they’ll move on to something more profitable. Remember, science is a business, too. They run on profit/loss statements instead of just their feelings.

I wrote that last sentence before I actually checked out Animal Aid’s website. The biggest page on there is their Shopping page. Seems there is pretty good money in the activist stance. One of their catchier bits is their “Animals Don’t” campaign. It states:

    Animals don’t smoke
    Animals don’t drive
    Animals don’t wear make up
    Animals don’t use paint
    Animals don’t drink alcohol
    Animals don’t drop bombs

    Because we do, why should they suffer?
I put together my own much shorter list:

    Animals don’t actively contribute to the forwarding of societal goals, nor do they have the potential to do so on their own

    Because we do, why should we extend to them moral equivalence?

Saturday, July 28, 2007

S-A-T-U-R-D-A-Y...Random!

Some of my favorite 80s tunes:
Don’t You (Forget About Me) – Simple Minds
Lay Your Hands on Me – Thompson Twins
One Night in Bangkok – Murray Head
How Soon is Now – The Smiths
The Promise – When in Rome
No More Words – Berlin
The Politics of Dancing – Re-Flex
Kids in America – Kim Wilde
Always Something There to Remind Me – Naked Eyes
Cry Little Sister – Lost Boys Soundtrack

I have this theory that every person has a song lodged in their brain that comes out when they’re not actively thinking of something. It doesn’t even matter if they hate the song. My wife is no Buffet fan, but hums or sings “Margaritaville” without realizing it. Similarly, when my mind shifts into neutral, I tend to whistle “Ode to Joy.” I’m not sure what purpose it serves. Maybe a mental screensaver to keep your brain booted up when it’s not otherwise engaged.

Favorite Video Game
Dragon’s Lair

Favorite Video Game quote
“Elf is about to die.”

Favorite Pinball Machine
Black Knight

I’d like to start a line of suede clothing, just so I could call it “Easily.”

Some of my favorite punchlines
Nice shot, Dad.
I didn’t know your father was a Pharmacist.
It’s the sound they make when they hit the bottom.
And as anyone with any sense could tell you, it also blew the Hell out of the meter.

A random picture from my collection


Last book I read
Harry Potter and the Deadly Hallows. God, I’m such a sheep.

Last movie I watched
The Wicker Man with Nicholas Cage

Did it suck?
Why, yes. Yes it did.

Monday, July 23, 2007

Useless Eaters

HUD extends disaster vouchers nine more months
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4990750.html

    The federal government will extend for 10 months its rental payments for about 11,400 families who lived in public housing or received federal housing vouchers before hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the U.S. housing secretary announced today.
Quick question: When did hurricanes Rita and Katrina hit?

A: August and September, 2005.

Yep, almost two full years ago. Think some of these folks might’ve been able to find jobs in two years? Especially given that unemployment currently is around 4.5%?

Another quick question: Why do you say 9 months in the headline, and 10 months in the lede?

    HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson said he and President Bush have determined that many displaced residents still need help, and that ending the program now would be "absolutely horrendous."
Horrendous: syn. alarming, appalling, atrocious, deplorable, depressing, disgusting, distressing, dreadful, frightful, ghastly, gruesome, harrowing, hideous, horrible, horrific, horrifying, offensive, raunchy, repulsive

Maybe that’s a bit strong, Alphonso. Some of us find it “horrendous” that we’re still paying for this.

    About 3,500 Houston-area households will be covered by the extension… The nine-month extension will cost about $105 million
So they’re paying each family $30,000 over these 9 months? That’s a $40,000/year salary. And they’re only paying for housing. By way of comparison, my housing costs are right at $10,000/year, including water and power.

Not to be outdone, FEMA is extending benefits through March 2009.

http://houstonhurricanerecovery.org/show_content_article.asp?id=4262007-10502&category=housing

    Officials of HUD and FEMA said the extension of housing benefits will help insure that all evacuees will receive the kind of assistance that will enable them to make a successful transition back into the community.
I’m guessing if they haven’t “transitioned” within 3 ½ years, they ain’t gonna. What’s the official point where “transition” becomes “permanence”?

    While there were no specific references to it in the conference, there also is expected to be regular recertification requirements for evacuees. These will make sure that the housing benefits are only going to those evacuees who genuinely need the aid.
I looked up the recertification form:
http://houstonhurricanerecovery.org/multimedia/2007_fema_recertification_form.pdf

One page. One. Fucking. Page. Tell me, faithful readers, how many pages are in your 1040?

    Another new provision announced would enable evacuees now housed in FEMA travel trailers and mobile homes to buy those housing units at fair market value.
The trailers you’re being sued over? Why not just give them the damned things and be done with it? Quit dragging it out. You’re never going to get the value of those trailers, anyway. If they haven’t bothered to scrape up the cash to get a place of their own by now, what makes you think for one second that they’ll have the wherewithal to buy these trailers?

    Officials estimated that the overall housing extension will cost more than $1 billion, to be paid for with FEMA funds.
How come it “only” costs $105 million for 9 months, but more than $1,000,000,000 for 17 months? That’s government math, that is. Well thank God FEMA is using its own money for this. Wait a minute...

Go here, read this:

http://members.cox.net/polincorr1/pol1.htm
Davy Crockett’s "Not Yours to Give" speech in Congress

Friday, July 20, 2007

Friday Night Randomness

Current Mood: Sedate
Current Musical Obsession: The Foiled album by Blue October, particularly Congratulations and Overweight

Current Current: 120 volts

Currant: the small, edible, acid, round fruit or berry of certain wild or cultivated shrubs of the genus Ribes

I have a lot of characters that I have developed for some writing groups I belong to. Most of them are female. It doesn't matter if they're a human assassin, a ghoul, a jilted lover, or a werewolf, they're all incredible badasses, able to take care of themselves and others with grace, style, and inner strength. This probably reflects how I feel about women in general. Then again, maybe I'm a heroine addict.


Ran across this picture online:




This is what I wrote:


    Sometimes the perfect person to confess your innermost desires and fears to is a stranger on a train. No commitments, no judgments - just an ear in which to pour your dreams and fantasies. The night outside the coach window reaches in and cloaks you, and the rumble of the steel wheels masks your fevered murmurings.

    We were heading for the same place. A city once built on dreams. But as happens so often with dreams, the joy had leaked out little by little, leaving only hollow shells behind. Gaping façades of blasted fulfillment stood mocking those that had dared to reach for the light. It was a place where you whispered your hopes, keeping them small and unnoticeable, hoping they would find a sheltered spot to grow.

    Our rendezvous point: the old clocktower. Pole star for every desperate person anxious to create a small, sweaty pocket of connection with someone else. Rising high into the smoky skies, a phallic monument to the clumsy fumblings of cold numb hands desperately trying to maneuver past belt buckles and buttons. Sooty fingers staining delicate white satin and lace, driving towards the heat they hide away from the world.

    The face of the clock mocks me. “You fool!” it chimes. “You believed her? The promise of a stranger on a train?”

    “yes,” I whisper.

    And I did believe her. I wanted so much to believe her. Her yearning was a great beacon in this grey world. Not just for satisfying lust, though that was a part of it. By design, that is always a part of it. She had spoken of the sound of boots dancing on cobblestones, and of spreading quicksilver wings of defiance, and flying away!…the two of us…flying…
    together.

    So I waited.

    She had to come! She had to! She was a stranger on a train yes, but…

    I looked at my watch, and the steam of my sigh was swallowed up by the dirty yellow tatters of fog that roamed the streets.

    I couldn’t wait any longer. Soon the sun would rise, sweeping the protective shadows away into a corner, and illuminating the pain of false hope on my face. I crept away on my numbed feet, leaving behind the unfulfilled promise: a pile of broken breadcrumbs and a pool of shadow rapidly running down a nearby drain. This was my body, this was my blood.

    I would have shared it with you.

    The edge of the city is already awash with a cruelly delicate sunrise. A soft pink that only serves to emphasize the desolation it faces. A number of piers jut outwards, giant fingers grasping for a bit of the peace and beauty that surely is present just over the horizon. Surely all places can’t be like this, whistle stops for strangers on trains, rotting carcasses pretending to life. Surely somewhere people still dance on cobblestones. It can’t all be this…hopeless.

    The call of a train whistle pierces me, and I turn to the sea to allow the wind to dry my tears. It is then that I notice. I still, not daring to believe, bracing against the culmination of a last cruel jest. But no. Her arms grasp the railing of the pier, holding herself down against the pull of the sky. And as I walk towards her, I can see quicksilver.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

The World Needs More Loofs

A coworker described me as “quiet and aloof” the other day. I’m not sure what to do about it. Should I be noisy and chatter constantly? Then she’ll complain that I’m a distraction and am negatively impacting production.

I sit in a room with a group of people that I do not work directly with. I provide minor services to them on occasion, but our primary jobs do not intersect. Secondly, I am older than most of them by at least a decade, and there’s only one other that’s married with children.

Don’t get me wrong, I do like them. I’ve been social – going to lunches, movies and housewarming parties, getting the occasional drink after work, goofing around at breaks. On the whole, though, I have nothing to add, nor take away from, the majority of their conversations. I’m not involved in their work, so I can’t advise or offer opinions, and their social chatter revolves around subjects I have no stake in: movies I won’t see, music I don’t like, arguments with their boy/girlfriends that only hold historical interest for me. Conversely, they have no concern about the things that hook my mind. For example, one of them was recently talking about her favorite contestant on American Idol. At the same time, I was e-mailing a friend a link to a scholarly article about Aristophanes’ use of satire and meta in “The Clouds”.

Not a whole lot of middle ground, there.

I’m also quiet because I’m thinking. This runs counter to most office work, where if you aren’t striking the keyboard or on the phone, you are considered to be goofing off. I can easily sit with my eyes closed, listening to my headphones, and with all distractions thus blocked out, come up with enough material to allow me to complete two weeks’ worth of projects. What do you think the reaction is of any manager that comes across an employee sitting like that? Allow me to don my “misunderstood artist” hat for a moment, and submit the standard complaint that the “corporate stiffs just don’t get us creative types”. We need headspace, man, cuz, like, conceptualization has to evolve, you know?

Similarly, I jump from subject to subject like Pitfall Harry crossing crocodile-infested waters. I’ll latch on to some random trivia and run it to the ground, or I’ll go off on what seem to be unrelated tangents. It’s just how my mind works. It’s how I acquire background, context, and foundational information, which serves as a reservoir of knowledge. It may look like I’m digging up song lyrics, but I might just be trying to find a way to express a certain concept, and that song came to mind. If it hit the top 40 or got a Grammy, the songwriter obviously tapped into some universal feeling, and I want that kind of response. (To be fair, I might have just been curious as to what the singer was actually saying in the second verse, but it all goes into the same box. I’ll use it at some point.)

That’s the other reason I come across as aloof, I think. My job is mentally stimulating. I basically get to daydream, and codify the results into marketing materials. I don’t usually get bored, so I don’t feel any pressure to chat with my coworkers, who are trying to break the monotony or wake themselves up. More often than not, the inanity of their subjects is a distraction rather than an escape. Why would I participate in a process that keeps me from performing at my best? If that makes me aloof, so be it. I’m satisfied with the quality of the work I’m turning out, and isn’t that the true business measurement?

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Not a Fan

Shortly after Father’s Day, my wife told me that it was always difficult to pick out a card for me. “You don’t play golf, you don’t fish or hunt, you don’t tinker with the cars or the yard, you don’t watch sports. All you do is read and write, and they don’t have any ‘To a well-read Dad’ cards.” Fortunately, I like goofy humor, so it’s not a total wash for her.

She’s right, though, I don’t do any of those things. I never got into hunting, I think fishing is the second most boring thing on the planet – after golf – and I never saw the point in watching other people play sports. If you like football, fine. Go play it. Spending a whole weekend watching one game after another is a pointless waste of time.

I really don’t understand the fascination with pre-game shows, either. Now you’re watching someone else talk about other people playing the game before it’s even been played. They’re not going to be revealing any secrets about the game, showing sneak previews or spoilers. They’re just offering their best guesses about how the players will perform. They’re doing exactly the same thing every sports fan does, only it’s being televised, and they get paid way too much money for it. It’s excruciating to watch them drag out maybe fifteen minutes’ worth of information over a two-hour show. And the interviews are so generic, they may as well be left out.

“Coach, you just hired Bobbie Chowder. How do you think he’s gonna do for you this season?”

What’s the coach going to say? That he thinks Bobbie is going to severely handicap the team and cost them the shot at the title? Of course not. He hired him because he thought Bobbie’d be an asset. Why else? Then they turn to the player.

“Bobbie, what are you going to do now that you’re here in Podunk?”

“Well, I’m just using the Podunk Ponies as a stepping stone to the better franchises. I needed some pro experience, and I figure I can run circles around everyone else here, so I stand a better chance at pumping up my stats without getting injured. Once I’ve moved up, I’ll use my popularity to land a couple of sneaker endorsements, release a rap album and try my hand at acting. Six years, tops, and I’m out.”

Wouldn’t that be refreshing? But no, we get the same “I’m just here to do my best for the team.” pabulum.

Maybe I’m overanalyzing this, but I’ve never understood the slavish dedication to one particular team. If it’s your Alma Mater, sure, I can appreciate that, but other than that, there’s no rationality behind it. People say they like the coach, but they don’t change teams to follow the coach’s career. Or they like particular players, but again, they’re still rooting for that team even after the entire roster has changed several times. I just don’t get it.

And the feuds. Good lord. The “traditional” enmity between teams is ridiculous. People pump it up to the level of clan warfare, particularly at the college level. When I lived in South Carolina, you were either a Clemson Tigers fan, or a Gamecocks fan. I was apathetic to both, but whenever I saw some Southern Belle wearing an “I Like the Cocks” shirt, it was sort of compelling. People insist that they “hate” the Pioneers, or the Fighting Cephalopods, or whomever it is that they take turns with in winning the Big Games, and the Pioneers say that they hate them right back, but the fact that both schools are still standing leads me to doubt everyone’s sincerity. “But it’s just a game,” you reply. Exactly my point, folks. Settle down.

I know people who have entire rooms in their homes dedicated to a particular team. Everything in the room has the team logo on it, and all the furnishings are in the team colors. That’s a bit obsessive, I think. I know one family that puts up a Christmas tree decorated solely with team ornaments. That’s more than a bit frightening.

I’m in a college town now, and every so often, we’ll have a Game Day in the office. People are encouraged to wear the school colors. Those few that don’t support the locals will show up in the opposing team’s colors, and there is much hearty ribbing amongst them. Meanwhile, I’m hoping that I don’t accidentally dress in the other team’s colors (I don’t keep track. Surprise.), because if I’m accosted by someone wearing an “I BLEED PURPLE” shirt, I’m likely to stab them to ascertain. Playoffs are the worst, because if “we” win, everybody is insufferably smug, and if “we” lose, everyone bitches the rest of the day.

I’ve thought about keeping up with some obscure (to the average American sports fan, anyway) sport like petanque, just so when people ask me if I saw the game on Saturday, I can inundate them with unfamiliar names, complaints about perplexing infractions of incomprehensible rules, overexcitement about narrow wins, or soul-crushing grievances about narrow losses. If they try to tell me that it’s not worth all of the drama, I’ll at least have them on record next time they want to try and attack me with player stats or Instant Replay glory days.

Then I’ll give them a carreau.

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Godwin-ing My Own Blog

Bush like Hitler, says first Muslim in Congress

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/14/wbush114.xml

    America's first Muslim congressman has provoked outrage by apparently comparing President George W Bush to Adolf Hitler and hinting that he might have been responsible for the September 11 attacks.

    Addressing a gathering of atheists in his home state of Minnesota, Keith Ellison, a Democrat, compared the 9/11 atrocities to the destruction of the Reichstag, the German parliament, in 1933. This was probably burned down by the Nazis in order to justify Hitler's later seizure of emergency powers.


Can we please stop with the damned Hitler comparisons? They are so tiresome. Why does the Left try to paint Conservatives (and Bush) with this brush? That’s a rhetorical question, by the way. They’re counting on the general public’s total ignorance of history, and courting visceral reactions instead of reasoned argument.

Whenever I hear someone refer to a conservative as a Nazi, here is the argument I offer.

Here are some of the traits of Hitler and his Nazi party, which roughly translates as the ‘National Socialist Party.’

1. Believed all business should be run by the State, and all profits made by that business should be the property of the State.

2. Despised personal profit as greedy and against the good of the state.

3. Believed in a strong, state-run education system to instill the ideologies of “the party” counter to the teachings of parents and families.

4. Had full run of the media, and used it exclusively to propagandize the views of the party.

5. Sought to tighten regulations on business, and to absorb the economies of others to compensate when their economic system weakened.

6. Was anti-gun. Implemented and then enforced a national confiscation of firearms.

7. Was pro-abortion.

8. Was pro-euthanasia.

9. Was pro-eugenics.

10. Was an animal-rights activist.

11. Was vegetarian.

12. Believed personal sexual fetishes were fine and a private matter, especially for politicians.

13. Hated Christianity and was anti-religion in general, though tried to use the church for political support when needed.

14. Was a vehement anti-smoker, and wanted to ban all smoking nationally.

15. Believed in national healthcare as part of their platform.

16. Tried to enforce national exercise programs for both the physical and fiscal health of the State.

Does this sound more like today’s American Christian conservative, or the left wing of the Democrat party?

Monday, July 9, 2007

Oh the difference a preposition makes.

Yeah, I’m a geek. I get a thrill from grammatically-sweet sentence constructions. Go ahead and point and laugh, but there’s a place in this world for people that enjoy using language well. There’s a lot of money to be made by those whose communication talent rises above TXT messaging. Madison Avenue comes to mind. I’ve noticed that a lot of people tend to look down on ad writing, defining it as somewhat less pure than, say, their shitty poetry, but I don’t know of a single person that makes a living solely off of their poetry. They’re always teachers or counselors or something in addition. Never just a poet. There are a lot more people paying their bills solely by writing ads than odes.

Whether you’re writing a poem lovely as a tree, or pimping calling plans in a Sunday circular, the goal of any writer is to get read. So we all sweat over our dog-eared thesauri, beating back the blank pages one word at a time – trying to find the perfect resonance with our imagined audience. When we do manage to craft something worthwhile, we acknowledge it as the fragile, transitory thing that it is, for it will soon be lost in the pressure to create the new, the next, the now.

Fortunately, it looks like this blogging thing will be around a while, so we can at least keep a record of our fleeting victories, adding a small trumpet blast to the cacophony. It doesn’t matter if we’re the only ones to hear it.

I was cleaning up a press release for one of our divisions today, and cogitated long upon this sentence:

“We are achieving rapid growth to support multi-axis and one-hit machining on latest generation mill-turn machines.”

I didn’t like it. It was awkward and unclear. Were we expecting to be able to support these machines once we hit a certain growth target, or were we growing in our ability to support them? Either way, it sounded weak. Like we were playing catch-up with a certain segment of the industry.

I stood, hand on chin, chewing on my pipe stem and frowning in a wizened manner. I pondered. I weighed and discarded options. The stillness of my countenance belied the centuries of etymological pressure I brought to bear on the problem. With great care I reached out and made a tiny change. But as a master Go player can upset an opponent’s carefully-built strategy with the turn of one stone, so did I transform the entire conceptualization of the piece.

“We are achieving rapid growth by supporting multi-axis and one-hit machining on latest generation mill-turn machines.”

No longer were we thrashing about in the backfield of technological development, trying desperately to keep pace. Now, our explosive growth was instead fueled by that same advancement. The fact that we could and did support the latest machines was the reason people flocked to our banner. It implied that our competitors couldn’t offer the same service, and promised the customer that they could expand all they wanted without fear of being stuck with obsolete technology.

One different word. One world of difference.

Toot.

Saturday, July 7, 2007

Pricks, Pricks, and Pricks

Swimming with the Sharks
I went strolling through the Yellow Pages recently, looking for an attorney. (Before my wife or coworkers start getting skittish, I have some questions on copyrights.) I must’ve gone through six or seven pages of ads for personal injury attorneys before I saw any listings for other legal services. Looking over those ads, with their promises of “Getting you the money you deserve!”, just made me tired. When did we become such whiners? How did we go from the Greatest Generation to the Paid Victimhood Generation? To hear the lawyers tell it, there are no accidents anymore, only malicious and gross negligence. Common sense has been drawn and quartered, and left hanging from the gibbet of instant gratification and no personal responsibility.

Life after the Knife
Yes, dear readers, your favorite feline had a quick surgery last Thursday. Not that kind. I had a small abdominal hernia that needed attention before it became a large abdominal hernia. Things got off to a somewhat shaky start when the anesthesiologist came in to go over the procedure. “Mr. Cat? How are you this morning? So…you’re here to get your gall bladder out?”

“Hope not.”

Once we got all that worked out, it was pretty straightforward stuff. I remember the cold heat of the anesthesia crawling up my arm, then I was back in the recovery room. The doc sent me home with a scrip for Percoset…and that’s where it gets interesting.

Now, this being my first surgery, I’ve never had occasion to take the really good narcotics before. I’ve had morphine once, and I took an occasional Flexeril for migraines back in the day, but this is the first time I’ve had a regular regimen of painkillers. It’s an interesting effect: the world gets wrapped in cotton batting, and all your reactions are dampened. You can still function, but you don’t really care. It really hits me when I’m drifting off to sleep. See, I’ve always been a particularly vivid dreamer. Always in color. Always in stereo. Sometimes with credits. I’ve even got about a half-dozen recurring dreams that have developed over the years that I instantly recognize as dreams when I’m in them. Now, those that know me know that I am fascinated with the macabre, so they won’t be surprised at all to learn that these Percoset-fueled phantasms display a bit of the grotesquerie. I once had a friend try and convince me to drop acid. Her main selling point was that it took what was in your head, and made it real. I reminded her of the stuff that was in my head, and she agreed that I should keep away from the LSD. I mean, when you’re standing in a crowded country dining parlor, and there’s a large Venus flytrap in the corner that keeps opening to reveal a creature about the size of a four-year-old, with an alligator head and skin made out of a night sky, and at a nearby table there’s a little girl wearing a floral print dress and two long braids, who would be cute if her teeth weren’t miniature skyscrapers, and the crowd around the fireplace nervously watches the cast iron pot hanging there, because every so often it rattles just slightly, well…you want that to be just a dream.

The corporate veil. And piercings.
I understand that some companies, particularly those in the Service sector, don’t want their employees wearing their various piercings when dealing with the customers, but sometimes it would actually be preferable. At least, it would for those of us with overactive imaginations. We went out to a restaurant recently, and the waitress that served us had a bright blue band-aid on the side of her nose. I would rather have seen a little diamond stud there than to wonder if she actually had some suppurating hole on the side of her skull where she was balancing our food tray. I once worked with a guy that has so many piercings, he would be pulled apart in an MRI. Once he took them out, you couldn’t even tell – except for the slight whistling sound when he moved fast. If management had demanded that he cover all the perforations, he’d’ve looked like the Mummy, which would have been just as distracting and off-putting. Setting a presentation standard is all well and good, but requiring some sort of obvious cover over an almost unnoticeable puncture is going a bit too far.

Thursday, July 5, 2007

Dark Humor, Sweet Revenge, and Repetitious Redundancy

Report: 25 killed in China karaoke blast http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CHINA_KARAOKE_BLAST?SITE=CAANR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

BEIJING (AP) -- A blast ripped through a karaoke parlor and bath house in northeast China, killing 25 people and injuring 33 others, state media reported Thursday.

Xinhua News Agency said the cause of the Wednesday night blast in Tianshifu township in Liaoning province was being investigated.

Several employees and the wife of the parlor owner, who was killed, were being questioned, it said, without saying if they were suspects.

Xinhua initially put the death toll at five, but said 25 bodies were found when rescuers had finished clearing away debris from the blast.

China has suffered a string of blasts, fires and accidents in shopping malls, movie theaters and other public places despite repeated government promises to improve safety. Many are blamed on lax safety procedures and negligence. In 2005, a fire in an illegally run bar in the southern city of Zhongshan killed 26 people. Local officials said the bar lacked fire extinguishers and its emergency exit was too narrow.

In China's worst recent nightclub disaster, a fire blamed on a welding accident tore through a disco in the central city of Luoyang in December 2000, killing 309 people. Local reports at the time said the building had failed 18 safety checks in two years.


If only they’d had some sort of fire drill in place.

I don’t know what to make of all the recent horror stories about China. Poisoned food, lead paint – why is the media painting this picture? What mindset are they trying to cultivate? Are we supposed to stop buying products from China? If this scrutiny is being instigated by the government, I would suspect that they are trying to engineer some sort of economic hammer in the hopes of slowing down China’s enormous growth (read: competition). If the media is doing it on its own, they’re probably just trying to kill Wal-Mart.


Coyote causes fatal motorcycle crash
http://www.wzzm13.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=77466

Sure, it's insensitive, but this was the first thing I thought of:




Detroit employee sues city over co-worker's perfume
http://www.wzzm13.com/news/watercooler/watercooler_article.aspx?storyid=77513

DETROIT - A Detroit planning department employee has sued the city because she claims a coworker's strong fragrance prohibits her from working.

Susan McBride's lawsuit was filed yesterday in U.S. District Court in Detroit.

McBride claims she is severely sensitive to perfumes and other cosmetics. The lawsuit states the co-worker wore a strong scent and plugged in a scented room deodorizer which caused McBride to go home sick. The woman later agreed to stop using the room deodorizer but continued wearing perfume.

The suit says her work environment violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. McBride is asking for a ban on such scents at work and unspecified damages.


Okay, smokers. We have a precedent. At my signal…unleash lawsuit Hell.


Naked man walking near train tracks in Petaluma arrested
http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_6288982

Police have arrested a man who was drunkenly walking naked along the railroad tracks on Monday night for indecent exposure, criminal trespassing, annoying children, resisting arrest and being under the influence.

“Annoying children” is now a crime? I’m in trouble; I annoy my kids all the time. I’m assuming that it’s a misdemeanor, so logically, annoying an adult would be a felony. This has possibilities.

FYI: Annoying me is a capital crime.


Pleonasm Party
“I used my PIN number to get cash out of the ATM machine. I had to get a book on CAD design for the CAT test. I looked it up by the ISBN number, because I couldn’t find the UPC code.”

“Let me see if I understand. You used your personal identification number number to get cash out of the automatic teller machine machine. You had to get a book on computer-aided design design for the California achievement test test. You looked it up by the international standard book number number, because you couldn’t find the universal product code code."

"Uh...yes."

“You talk too much.”